Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

Wednesday, 2 November 2016

Constructive role of Peer Review in science

I am fortunate to have been interviewed by Publons on my views about peer review and scientific progress.
I took the opportunity to highlight that peer review has an essential constructive role in science, it is not only about setting a minimum standard. I also complimented the important role of editors, the elephant in the room of peer review.

The full Q&A can be read here: [download pdf file].

Thursday, 27 October 2016

Fancy dresses and flaws in flammability requirements

After reading a sign in the local charity shop, I watched this excellent 2015 BBC One investigation piece on textile flammability requirements for children's fancy dresses. It was produced after the daughter of TV presenter Claudia Winkleman was badly injured in 2014 because her fancy Halloween dress got on fire. 

BBC One found that fancy dresses had been classified as children toys and not as children’s clothing for fire safety requirements. Toys have to pass a much less onerous flammability test than children’s clothing. Hence the danger, because fancy dresses are in close proximity to the body and can be very flammable due to the fluffy arrangements of synthetic and thin fabrics.

"Flammable fancy dress clothing", watch it here.

"Flammable fancy dress clothing" by BBC One.


There are three things that I would like to highlight about this case:

1) This safety flaw in the flammability requirements is born from the wrong trade classification of the consumer product, not from a lack of understanding of the fire hazard. Now that this is known, it should be easy to rectify.

2) The response of national retailers in 2015 was overwhelming. The BBC lists the responses of 12 major companies (eg, John Lewis, Mothercare, Toys ‘R’ Us) which revisited the safety of their products. Some of them (Fara Kids, for example, see photo from our local shop below) even stopped selling fancy dresses altogether.

3) The industry response has been towards increasing flammability requirements of fancy dresses and match the higher requirements of children’s nightwear. I say this because there are current pressures asking to downgrade flammability requirements of consumer products (eg, sofas in California).

Photo of the sign in our local charity shop.

Tuesday, 27 October 2015

Our Student at the Royal Welcome of Chinese President

I was delighted to learn that my PhD student Xinyan Huang attended the Royal Welcome and Honour Guard Inspection held by Queen Elizabeth II for the Chinese President Xi Jinping. This is a traditional ceremonial welcome to foreign leaders visiting the UK. It took place last Tuesday near Buckingham Palace with the presence of senior royal family members and political leaders.

Xinyan was invited by Lord Chamberlain. There were 80 guests, 40 Chinese and 40 British. He was invited as one of three students representing the 150,000 Chinese students in UK. An important factor for being chosen for the honor is that Xinyan was the only student from Imperial College winning the 2014 National Award for Outstanding Chinese Student Studying Abroad given annually worldwide by the China Scholarship Council.
 
Xinhua media describes it like this: "With 41 rounds of gun salute fired from Green Park and 62 from the Tower of London, the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh, bathed in rare London sunshine, formally welcomed Xi and Peng at the Royal pavilion on Horse Guards Parade".

Xinyan on the guest stage with the Honour Guard in the back.
Note: Xinyan is graduating from Imperial College soon and joins the University of California at Berkeley as a postdoc in the laboratory of Prof Fernandez-Pello.

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Fin's and Candle's Creative Contests: towards the motivation of engineering students

We engineers are in general not the best communicators nor the best at appreciating arts. These are not really topics of interest during university studies in Engineering Schools around the world. This was the theme of a latest editorial in Ingenia, the magazine of the Royal Academy of Engineering, where Dr Steedmand said "Engineers are rarely taught about public engagement and as a result are often criticised for lacking communication skills. A few engineers, through their work, do spend time with the public, but this is not enough. We need much more public engagement if we are to raise the awareness and understanding of engineering and its role in society".

I wanted to build on this in the two courses I teach at Imperial College, ME2 Heat Transfer and ME4 Combustion. I also wanted to boost somehow students' motivation. So I organized Creative Contests at the beginning of the new academic year. The instructions to participate were the following:
"I have three extra copies of the textbook to give away. If interested, send me a poem, comic, drawing, painting, song, video, or anything creative that explains why you are taking this course. Art, wit and humour are allowed". 

And I gave them one week to submit their pieces. I received several submissions and found three winners for each course. Congratulations to the winners, hope you use extensively your new gifted textbooks.

Submissions to the 2013 Fin's Creative Contest in ME2 Heat Transfer:
(first three are the winners. Each received a hardcopy of Incropera's Foundations of Heat Transfer)

by Keon - Heat transfer is not a lie - Click for song . Click for lyrics.
by Hugh  - Amazing Heat Transfer Acrostic

 



By Eifion - Heat Transfer Limericks



By Kathryn- why study heat transfer?
By Robert - Five reasons why I am studying heat
transfer?
Video: http://www.youtube.com/embed/GgiP9GThwtI?rel=0
Video: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxJI_xWmBZkoblM1eU5RY2NYbEE/preview?pli=1 

 Submissions to the 2013 Candle's Creative Contest in ME4 Combustion:
(First three submissions are the winners. Each received a hard copy of McAllister's Fundamentals of Combustion Processes).

By Christian - Combustion, it blows you away!
By Wayne - Little deyas

By Maria - Flames estatue

by William - Combustion
 
Miles sent this photo by McLaren of an P1 exhaust flame

Boris - Hot air balloon in Morocco

Guillaume - First bone fire in human history - synchronistic style

Walaa selected the poem Fire by 'livin the night life'

Friday, 19 April 2013

Likely sequence of events during West Fertilizer explosion, Texas

UPDATE: I have been quoted in Chemistry & Industry 77, May 2013

The cause for the recent incident at the West Fertilizer site in Texas is under investigation and remains unknown, but many parallels can be drawn from previous similar events involving large quantities of inorganic fertilizers.

Aftermath of the mass explosion following a fire in West, Texas, April 17, 2013.
Photo by REUTERS, Mike Stone.
It is the ammonium nitrate (AN) that poses the best known fire and explosion hazards in fertilizer storage sites, especially of the NPK fertilizer type (nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium). Some media outlets are speculating about exploding anhydrous ammonia tanks, but that is a very rare event not ever observed before. Unfortunately, mass fires and explosions in AN warehouse are not uncommon events (average worldwide frequency is about one every three years). One example, in 2001 the AN warehouse of a fertilizer plant in Toulouse, France, exploded resulting in 30 people dead and >2000 injured. The blast wave shattered windows up to 3 km away [source: wikipedia].

I am confident the Fire Service was aware that situation was very difficult and probably had a special emergency plan to deal with this particular site. They attended the fire to comply with their duty in the face of extreme danger. Their main priority would be to control the fire so it does not grow to the critical size when an explosion of AN could be triggered. The science behind a mass explosion following a fire in AN plants is still in bare bones, we know so little, and cannot be predicted. So imagine how difficult it is to deal with the emergency.

The source of the hazard is the exothermic decomposition of AN which begins around 200-230 ◦C. It has been suggested that it follows two reaction paths (the second is more exothermic):

NH4NO3→ N2O + 2 H2O
4 NH4NO3→ 3 N2 +2 NO2 +8 H2O

(a) Unreacted NPK fertilizer granules and (b) cross section showing partially reacted sample with 4 phases visible. Photos from Hadden and Rein 2007.

The fire could have been initiated by self-sustaining decomposition (SSD). This is the phenomenon in which the temperature of a bed of AN-fertilizer rises due to spontaneous heat generation until thermal runaway leads to a fire. The flames would have had then spread to other flammable materials in the plant, like supplies, fuel, packaging, offices or vehicles. SSD of fertilizers is promoted by chemical compounds present in NPK and also the accidental contamination with organic materials. It can start at around 100 ◦C, which is a significantly lower temperatures than that required for pure AN decomposition.

A likely sequence of events is that an accidental heat source (e.g. hot work, hot surface, small fire) starts a SSD reaction in a bed on AN-fertilizer which slowly grows and leads to the fire that the Fire Service were battling. At some point, the flames grow faster than expected and rapidly heat very large quantities of AN, which leads to detonation (=explosion and blast caused by the very rapid decomposition of AN inside an enclosure).

A large detonation wave like this one devastates life and structures over a wide area around the point of origin. Moreover, the burning fertilizer becomes airborne with the explosion and lands further away igniting subsequent fires, as seen in the aftermath of this explosion.

---
Most of the information I used is from our 2007 paper:
- R Hadden, G Rein, Small-scale experiments ofself-sustaining decomposition of NPK fertilizer and application to events aboard the Ostedijk in 2007, Journal of Hazardous Materials 186, pp 731–737, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.047. 

Sunday, 29 July 2012

Brunel y Martinez


Carta envida hoy al director del periódico El Mundo.
--------------------

Sr. Director:

¿Martínez?. Fuente: Wikipedia
El artículo recientemente publicado en su periódico y que firma Luis Martínez ("De 'Trainspotting' a 'Disappointing'", 28/07/2012) ignora valientemente quien es uno de los personajes más importantes de la historia de la humanidad. En referencia a ceremonia de apertura de los Juegos Olímpicos de Londres, el artículo dice " ¿De qué se reiría Brannagh con su muy shakespeariana apostura? ¿De explotar a los pobres campesinos (él 'hacía' de empresario, dedujimos)"

Durante la ceremonia, el actor Kenneth Branagh hacia el papel de Isambard Kingdom Brunel (1806-1859), ingeniero durante la revolución industrial y uno de los personajes británicos más importante de todos los tiempos. Es relativamente normal que en España no se sepa mucho de Brunel, dada la poca importancia que tienen la ciencia y la tecnología en el país, pero lo peor es la asociación automática y trivial con la explotación de campesinos.  Sin Brunel, el Señor Martínez no existiría, o sería un campesino, y El Mundo sería muchísimo más pequeño.


Guillermo Rein

Edimburgo, Reino Unido

Friday, 20 July 2012

Smouldering fire of organic soil in Oregon National Wildlife Refuge


The dry organic soil in Malheur National Wildlife Refuge has ignited and several smouldering hot spots have been burning since last week. They were started by the flaming Miller Homestead wildfire on the evening of July 12 but the smouldering fire is now slowly self-spreading.

Suppression attempts are under way by the Fire Service including local flooding and compartmentation. It is essential to act quickly. Under dry conditions as the ones currently present in Oregon, smouldering fires can last for months, releasing large quantities of old carbon stored in the soil.

Smouldering organic soil after the Miller Homestead Wildfire moved onto the refuge the evening of July 12. Photo Credit USFWS.






Thursday, 5 July 2012

Geoengineering and Burt Rutan - The Economist

Letter to the Editor of The Economist sent on 6 of June 2012.

----


Dear Sir,

SpaceShipOne (designed by Mr Rutan)
at the National Air and Space Museum, Washington D.C.
Photo from wikipedia.
In your last Brain Scan article ("A maverick in flight", Technology Quarterly, June 2012) on the accomplishments of Burt Rutan, a pioneering and unconventional aerospace engineer, I find entertaining how Mr Rutan uses acrobatics to announce that global warming will lead environmentalists into an engineering breakthrough. He refers to unprecedented global warming and the tipping point for atmospheric carbon dioxide as "it’s just nonsense".

But this might not be a pejorative term for him. The statement is followed by the clarification:
 "You run into them [breakthroughs] when you’ve found something that doesn’t make sense and you find a way to make it work".

Maybe he is announcing the arrival of geoengineering. I would approve.

Best Regards,

-
Dr Guillermo Rein
Senior Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering
Imperial College London
http://www.eng.ed.ac.uk/~grein

Friday, 22 June 2012

Safety disadvantage of Plastic houses

Letter to the Editor of The Independent. Sent on 22 Jun 2012

----

Dear Sir,

EFTE roofs used in the Eden Project (wikipedia)
In your article "Here's one I won earlier" (21 Jun 2012), Alex Aldridge describes the winning idea of "Plastic houses" (eco homes with ETFE roofs) at the European Inventor Awards. He mentions its three main advantages (energy efficiency, blasts resistant, and light weight) but only two minor disadvantages (easy to cut through, noisy in rain).
He forgot to mention the most important of the disadvantages that happens to cancel one of advantages: while EFTE might be suited to resist terrorist bomb blasts, it definitely cannot resist fire. Moreover, it feeds to it as EFTE is a flammable material.

This brings bad news to plastic housing from a safety perspective.

Best Regards,
Dr Guillermo Rein
Senior Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering
Imperial College London
http://www.imperial.ac.uk/people/g.rein

Wednesday, 20 June 2012

Inside peer review: a (top science)^3 case

I just found a very interesting exercise of transparency in peer review on a top scientific topic (climate change) in a top scientific journal (PNAS) by a top researcher (Prof Lindzen, MIT). Note that Prof Lindzen portrays a minority scientific view, he thinks climate change forecasts are uncertain and might be overestimating warming:

 






I found this after reading the NYT article "Clouds’ Effect on Climate Change Is Last Bastion for Dissenters" by J Gillis, April 30, 2012.

Disclaimer: I post this becuase it is a very interesting and unique case of how peer review works inside a top journal (for good and for bad). This does not mean I support Prof Lindzen's scientific work (my expertise is in fire dynamics).

Friday, 27 January 2012

Smouldering fire of large compost heap in Havelock

After Hurricane Irene made landfall on Aug 27, 2011, the city of Havelock in North Carolina (USA) decided to shred all damaged trees and vegetation and collect them in a large heap. The resulting biomass stockpile was ~4000 m^3 in volume, the equivalent capacity of a 16 m cube. The idea was to produce plenty of free compost for the city.

But as the heap dried and decomposed, on its way to become compost, it also started to self-heat and a smouldering fire was initiated without any external source. All organic porous media is known to self-heat under the right environmental conditions of low moisture, poor ventilation and large stockpiles, and these were met in the Havelock heap. Havelock News reports that the fire was first detected on Jan 17, 2012, probably becuase of large and visible off-gassing. This means that the first hotspots formed several weeks before that, maybe during early Fall. After it was detected, the Fire Havelock Fire and Rescue Department and the US Forest Service were called in. They dosed large amounts of water and spread the heap material over a wider area to quench the fire. And it worked, so far. But hotspots deep into the heap are going to be very difficult to cool down completely.
A bulldozer spreads out the pile of smouldering biomass in Havelock. Photo by Drew C. Wilson/Havelock News.
Self-heating
In this poster that I presented recently, I explained self-heating as follows:
"Self-heating refers to the tendency of certain reactive solids in oxidative atmospheres to spontaneous exothermic reactions at low or ambient temperatures. This is a well known problem for industries transporting and storing porous carbon-rich materials [eg, peat, biochar, coal, char and most organic powders]. Initially, small amounts of heat are released and accumulate during longer times when heat losses are low (eg, large stockpiles, high ambient temperatures). This results in a sustained increase of temperature without any external heat source. Above a certain temperature, the process self-accelerates and leads to thermal run away. For example, Semenov’s Ignition Theory describes mathematically the process as controlled by heat generation and heat losses"
Mititating Actions
The main culprit in the case of the Havelock heap seems to be its large size. In other to prevent self-heating events, stockpiles must be kept below a certain critical size. The fact that the fire was detected in winter time when ambient temperatures are low (between -1 and 10 C), testifies to the strong reactivity of the biomass heap. But there are other contributing factors. In order to mitigate the risk of self-heating fires, heaps ought to be designed complying with the following principles:  

*Stockpile size: As the size of the pile is made smaller, heat losses increase and the risk of self-heating is reduced. The maximum safe stockpile size is given by the ambient temperature and reactivity of the material.  *Wetting: Material with large moisture contents do not ignite.  
*Ventilation: Add design features that enhance natural ventilation and cooling.
*Inertation: Reduce reactivity by mixing the biomass with inert material like sand (see here).

Where these observed in this case?

Thursday, 29 September 2011

Abysmal technical gaps in Scientific American

I recently sent a Letter to the Editor of Scientific American calling her attention to the abysmal technical gaps in the September issue article "Castles in the Air" by Mark Lamster where the failed prophecy that the attacks of 9/11 were to end the age of the skyscraper is discussed. The letter can be read here and is reproduced below. 


UPDATE Sept 2011: This letter was followed by two more from Dr Bisby and Hilditch
UPDATE Dec 2011: The letter of Dr Bisby has been published in the December 2011 issue of Scientific American. 


--
(email sent on Thur 15 Sep 2011 to editors@sciam.com) 

Dear Editor of Scientific American,

Your September issue included the piece "Castles in the Air" by Mark Lamster where the failed prophecy that the attacks of 9/11 were to end the age of the skyscraper is discussed.  The article highlights that 2011 will be the single greatest year for the construction of tall buildings in history. That China is leading the skyscraper boom, yet their engineering design is dominated by American firms.

The article discusses design issues on evacuation. But the World Trade Center was designed to evacuate rapidly, and so both towers WTC1 and 2 did below the impact floors on 9/11. WTC7 was also evacuated in time.

The article also discusses design issues on aircraft impact. But the World Trade Center was designed to withstand the impact of a large aircraft, and so both towers WTC1 and 2 did on 9/11. They collapsed because of fire. WTC7 was not hit by an aircraft, but collapsed due to fire as well.

The article goes to imply that the design of tall buildings for protection against terrorist attacks is mostly about aircraft impact and evacuation. It does not discuses fire. But WTC 1, 2 and 7 collapsed because of fire.

So they only issue that is not addressed in the article is the one that brought World Trade Center down, and the one where design advances over the past decade have been most marginal. This is a thin favour to fire engineering and to the safety of tall buildings.

Dr Guillermo Rein
Senior Lecturer in Mechanical Engineering
University of Edinburgh
http://www.eng.ed.ac.uk/~grein
"so easy it seemed, Once found, which yet unfounded most would have thought, Impossible!" J Milton